Screener
KPHO vs FLCH
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs Franklin FTSE China ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and FLCH are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and FLCH 0.19%. The main difference: FLCH costs 0.84% less per year.
- FLCH costs 0.84% less per year.
- FLCH is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLCH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $273M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.27% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -62.09% |
Similar to KPHO and FLCH
Explore further