Screener
KPHO vs FLTW
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and FLTW are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and FLTW 0.19%. The main difference: KPHO covers emerging markets; FLTW covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KPHO covers emerging markets; FLTW covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLTW costs 0.84% less per year.
- FLTW is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLTW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +99.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +39.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 27.33% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -38.00% |
Similar to KPHO and FLTW
Explore further