Screener
KPHO vs FLJP
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and FLJP are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and FLJP 0.09%. The main difference: KPHO covers emerging markets; FLJP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KPHO covers emerging markets; FLJP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLJP costs 0.94% less per year.
- FLJP is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLJP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.17% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -32.49% |
Similar to KPHO and FLJP
Explore further