Screener
KPHO vs FLAU
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and FLAU are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and FLAU 0.09%. The main difference: KPHO covers emerging markets; FLAU covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KPHO covers emerging markets; FLAU covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- FLAU costs 0.94% less per year.
- FLAU is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | FLAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $86M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -45.73% |
Similar to KPHO and FLAU
Explore further