Screener
KRMA vs HEAL
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Global X HealthTech ETF
Key differences
- KRMA costs 0.07% less per year.
- KRMA is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | HEAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $25M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | -20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | -10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | -14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.35% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -65.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and HEAL
Explore further