Screener
KRMA vs EMC
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF
Key differences
- KRMA costs 0.22% less per year.
- KRMA covers north america markets; EMC covers emerging markets.
- KRMA follows a index tracking strategy; EMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | EMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $61M |
| Since | 2016 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.33% | 20.53% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -18.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and EMC
Explore further