Screener
KRMA vs RYLD
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- KRMA costs 0.17% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than KRMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KRMA is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KRMA follows a index tracking strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.33% | 10.84% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and RYLD
Explore further