Screener
KRMA vs RYLG
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.08% less per year.
- KRMA is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KRMA is classified as equity, while RYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KRMA follows a index tracking strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KRMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $8M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.33% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and RYLG
Explore further