Screener
KRMA vs USCA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
Key differences
- USCA costs 0.36% less per year.
- USCA is significantly larger than KRMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, USCA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KRMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | USCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.35% | 12.20% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -19.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and USCA
Explore further