Screener
KRMA vs USCL
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
Key differences
- USCL costs 0.35% less per year.
- USCL is significantly larger than KRMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KRMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | USCL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.35% | 12.23% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -18.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and USCL
Explore further