Screener
LCR vs CRUX
Leuthold Core ETF vs Columbia Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CRUX costs 0.52% less per year.
- CRUX is significantly larger than LCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LCR is classified as mixed asset, while CRUX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CRUX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LCR | CRUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2020 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 4.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.52% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.44% | -1.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LCR and CRUX
Explore further