Screener
LCR vs FDRS
Leuthold Core ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.35% less per year.
- LCR is classified as mixed asset, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LCR follows a active selection strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- LCR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LCR | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $77M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.52% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.44% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LCR and FDRS
Explore further