Screener
LDSF vs LGOV
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF vs First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- LGOV costs 0.28% less per year.
- LGOV is significantly larger than LDSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LDSF follows a active selection strategy; LGOV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LDSF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LDSF | LGOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $664M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.61% | 4.21% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +2.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | -1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | -0.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.05% | 6.99% |
| Max drawdown | -8.56% | -30.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LDSF and LGOV
Explore further