Screener
LDSF vs LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- LMBS costs 0.11% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than LDSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LDSF follows a active selection strategy; LMBS uses index tracking.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LDSF | LMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.61% | 4.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.05% | 1.96% |
| Max drawdown | -8.56% | -6.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LDSF and LMBS
Explore further