Screener
LDUR vs MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MINT costs 0.18% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than LDUR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LDUR follows a index tracking strategy; MINT uses active selection.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LDUR | MINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $15.5B |
| Since | 2014 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 4.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.56% | 0.27% |
| Max drawdown | -8.68% | -4.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LDUR and MINT
Explore further