Screener
MINT vs EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- EMNT costs 0.12% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINT follows a active selection strategy; EMNT uses index tracking.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINT | EMNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.5B | $207M |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 4.12% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +3.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 4.60 | 2.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.27% | 0.42% |
| Max drawdown | -4.62% | -2.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINT and EMNT
Explore further