Screener
LFEQ vs CDX
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Simplify High Yield ETF
Key differences
- CDX costs 0.33% less per year.
- CDX is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; CDX uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | CDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $440M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 8.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | -0.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 5.69% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -13.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and CDX
Explore further