Screener
LFEQ vs TUA
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- TUA costs 0.33% less per year.
- TUA is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; TUA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | TUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $802M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | -0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 6.89% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -15.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and TUA
Explore further