Screener
LFEQ vs CGUS
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.25% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while CGUS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 12.48% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and CGUS
Explore further