Screener
LFEQ vs CCOR
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- LFEQ costs 0.71% less per year.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $28M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and CCOR
Explore further