Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

LFEQ vs EFA

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

LFEQ

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$30M

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$77.4B

Key differences

LFEQ is an alternative ETF, while EFA is an equity ETF. LFEQ charges 0.58% a year and EFA 0.32%.

  • LFEQ is an alternative fund, while EFA is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; EFA uses index tracking.
  • LFEQ covers North America; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
  • EFA costs 0.26% less per year.
  • EFA is much larger than LFEQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

LFEQEFA
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.32%
Fund size (AUM)$30M$77.4B
Since20172001
Dividend yield0.82%3.10%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americaglobal ex us
Strategytactical allocationindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.6%+18.4%
CAGR 3Y+18.4%+16.8%
CAGR 5Y+9.6%+8.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.990.86
Volatility 1Y12.24%15.27%
Max drawdown-35.19%-34.19%

Similar to LFEQ and EFA