Screener
LFEQ vs FDRS
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.09% less per year.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $77M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and FDRS
Explore further