Screener
LFEQ vs FNDX
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDX costs 0.33% less per year.
- FNDX is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while FNDX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; FNDX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $25.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +34.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 10.37% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -37.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and FNDX
Explore further