Screener
LFEQ vs SCHV
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.54% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while SCHV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; SCHV uses index tracking.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 10.71% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and SCHV
Explore further