Screener
LFEQ vs PWB
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- PWB is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while PWB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; PWB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +47.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +34.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +18.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 18.57% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and PWB
Explore further