Screener
LFEQ vs PY
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.43% less per year.
- PY is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while PY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; PY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $212M |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and PY
Explore further