Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

LFEQ vs TVAL

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs T. Rowe Price Value ETF

LFEQ

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$29M

TVAL

T. Rowe Price Value ETF

T. Rowe Price

Annual cost

0.33%

Fund size

$686M

Key differences

  • TVAL costs 0.25% less per year.
  • TVAL is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • LFEQ is classified as alternative, while TVAL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; TVAL uses active selection.
  • LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

LFEQTVAL
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.33%
Fund size (AUM)$29M$686M
Since20172023
Dividend yield0.86%1.03%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategytactical allocationactive selection
CAGR 1Y+30.3%+31.7%
CAGR 3Y+18.9%N/A
CAGR 5Y+10.4%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.02N/A
Volatility 1Y12.11%10.74%
Max drawdown-35.19%-14.84%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to LFEQ and TVAL