Screener
LFEQ vs SCHQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.55% less per year.
- SCHQ is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while SCHQ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; SCHQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $897M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | -0.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | -4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | -0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 9.08% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and SCHQ
Explore further