Screener
LFEQ vs SCHR
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHR costs 0.55% less per year.
- SCHR is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while SCHR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; SCHR uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | SCHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $13.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | -0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 3.46% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -16.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and SCHR
Explore further