Screener
LFEQ vs SCUS
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
Key differences
- SCUS costs 0.44% less per year.
- SCUS is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while SCUS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; SCUS uses active selection.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | SCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $224M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 0.66% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -0.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and SCUS
Explore further