Screener
LFEQ vs VUSB
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- VUSB costs 0.48% less per year.
- VUSB is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while VUSB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; VUSB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | VUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $8.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 4.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +3.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 2.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 0.65% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -1.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and VUSB
Explore further