Screener
LGH vs EZMO
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF vs Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- EZMO costs 0.17% less per year.
- LGH is significantly larger than EZMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LGH is classified as alternative, while EZMO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LGH follows a tactical allocation strategy; EZMO uses index tracking.
- LGH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGH | EZMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.83% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $555M | $16M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | — |
| Max drawdown | -29.60% | -9.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGH and EZMO
Explore further