Screener
LGH vs QQH
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- LGH follows a tactical allocation strategy; QQH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QQH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGH | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $555M | $697M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -29.60% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGH and QQH
Explore further