Screener
QQH vs HCMT
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
Key differences
- QQH costs 0.20% less per year.
- QQH is classified as alternative, while HCMT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QQH follows a active selection strategy; HCMT uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQH | HCMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $697M | $551M |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.43% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +42.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.79% | 24.51% |
| Max drawdown | -41.87% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQH and HCMT
Explore further