Screener
LGOV vs LDSF
First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
Key differences
- LGOV costs 0.28% less per year.
- LGOV is significantly larger than LDSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LGOV follows a index tracking strategy; LDSF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, LDSF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGOV | LDSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $664M | $160M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.21% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.0% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.7% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.13 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.99% | 2.05% |
| Max drawdown | -30.85% | -8.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGOV and LDSF
Explore further