Screener
LGRO vs FFLG
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- LGRO follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGRO | FFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $125M | — |
| Since | 2023 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +41.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.47% | 18.43% |
| Max drawdown | -23.26% | -44.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGRO and FFLG
Explore further