Screener
LGRO vs FELG
Level Four Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.32% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than LGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LGRO follows a index tracking strategy; FELG uses active selection.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGRO | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $125M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.40% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -23.26% | -23.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGRO and FELG
Explore further