Screener
LMBS vs HISF
First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF vs First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF
Key differences
- LMBS costs 0.17% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than HISF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| LMBS | HISF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.83% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $91M |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.09% | 4.94% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.98% | 3.36% |
| Max drawdown | -6.48% | -27.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LMBS and HISF
Explore further