Skip to content
Screener

LODI vs SCHO

AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF vs Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

LODI

AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$83M

SCHO

Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$13.2B

Key differences

Both LODI and SCHO are fixed income ETFs. LODI charges 0.15% a year and SCHO 0.03%. The main difference: LODI follows a active selection strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.

  • LODI follows a active selection strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.
  • SCHO costs 0.12% less per year.
  • SCHO is much larger than LODI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

LODISCHO
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.03%
Fund size (AUM)$83M$13.2B
Since20242010
Dividend yield4.98%3.94%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+5.7%+3.4%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+1.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.34
Volatility 1Y2.36%1.37%
Max drawdown-1.02%-5.69%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to LODI and SCHO