Skip to content
Screener

SCHO vs MSTI

Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF

SCHO

Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$13.2B

MSTI

Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$49M

Key differences

Both SCHO and MSTI are fixed income ETFs. SCHO charges 0.03% a year and MSTI 0.36%. The main difference: SCHO follows a index tracking strategy; MSTI uses active selection.

  • SCHO follows a index tracking strategy; MSTI uses active selection.
  • SCHO costs 0.33% less per year.
  • SCHO is much larger than MSTI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SCHOMSTI
Annual cost (TER)0.03%0.36%
Fund size (AUM)$13.2B$49M
Since20102023
Dividend yield3.94%5.31%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+3.4%+4.2%
CAGR 3Y+4.2%N/A
CAGR 5Y+1.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.34N/A
Volatility 1Y1.37%2.44%
Max drawdown-5.69%-1.47%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to SCHO and MSTI