Screener
LQ vs GKAT
Simplify Tax Aware Alternatives ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- LQ costs 0.44% less per year.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQ | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $158M |
| Since | 2026 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -2.82% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LQ and GKAT
Explore further