Screener
LQ vs KAT
Simplify Tax Aware Alternatives ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- LQ costs 0.60% less per year.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQ | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $688M |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -2.82% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LQ and KAT
Explore further