Screener
LQDI vs RINF
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF vs ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
Key differences
- LQDI costs 0.12% less per year.
- LQDI is significantly larger than RINF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LQDI is classified as alternative, while RINF is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, LQDI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RINF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQDI | RINF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $18M |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.56% | 3.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.36 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.00% | 4.58% |
| Max drawdown | -28.99% | -29.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LQDI and RINF
Explore further