Screener
RINF vs LQDH
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- LQDH costs 0.06% less per year.
- LQDH is significantly larger than RINF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, LQDH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RINF | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $506M |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.74% | 6.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.58% | 2.73% |
| Max drawdown | -29.18% | -24.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RINF and LQDH
Explore further