Screener
LRGC vs IWL
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.24% less per year.
- LRGC follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRGC | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -19.38% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRGC and IWL
Explore further