Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

LRGC vs MMAX

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

LRGC

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

AllianceBernstein

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.2B

MMAX

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$72M

Key differences

  • LRGC costs 0.11% less per year.
  • LRGC is significantly larger than MMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • LRGC is classified as equity, while MMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • LRGC follows a active selection strategy; MMAX uses structured outcome.

Side-by-side comparison

LRGCMMAX
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$1.2B$72M
Since20232025
Dividend yield0.55%0.77%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionstructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+25.3%+7.8%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y12.03%1.46%
Max drawdown-19.38%-1.93%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to LRGC and MMAX