Screener
LRGF vs FICS
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF vs First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF
Key differences
Both LRGF and FICS are equity ETFs. LRGF charges 0.08% a year and FICS 0.70%. The main difference: LRGF follows a index enhanced strategy; FICS uses index tracking.
- LRGF follows a index enhanced strategy; FICS uses index tracking.
- LRGF covers North America; FICS covers global markets excluding the US.
- LRGF costs 0.62% less per year.
- LRGF is much larger than FICS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LRGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRGF | FICS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $214M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | +5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.40% | 13.29% |
| Max drawdown | -36.03% | -29.16% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.