Screener
LRNZ vs ARTY
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
Key differences
- ARTY costs 0.22% less per year.
- ARTY is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ covers north america markets; ARTY covers global.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; ARTY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ARTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | ARTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +90.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +32.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.41% | 29.13% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -54.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and ARTY
Explore further