Screener
LRNZ vs FEBZ
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF
Key differences
- LRNZ costs 0.10% less per year.
- LRNZ is classified as equity, while FEBZ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; FEBZ uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, LRNZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | FEBZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $14M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 9.43% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -17.50% |
Similar to LRNZ and FEBZ
Explore further