Screener
LRNZ vs SEPZ
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
Key differences
- LRNZ costs 0.11% less per year.
- SEPZ is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ is classified as equity, while SEPZ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; SEPZ uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, LRNZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | SEPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $118M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 10.02% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -15.22% |
Similar to LRNZ and SEPZ
Explore further